Direct water on-site
Inventorying water for operations, washing, cooling, irrigation, and utilities, determining what exits in the product, discharge, or evaporation, and linking them to available sources and meters.
At Albuad Environmental Company, we offer a water footprint calculation service to understand water use within facilities, projects, and across the supply chain according to a specific scope. We review extraction, consumption, discharge, and reuse data, analyze water flows, sources, and data quality, and then identify conservation opportunities and improvement priorities.
The results help management link water use to production and operation, compare performance over time, and prepare data for sustainability reports. It is determined from the beginning whether the task is an operational water balance or a broader water footprint assessment, and the required methodology for each case.
The methodology, boundaries, and outputs are determined according to the project objective and available data; compliance with a specific standard or certification is not assumed without a scope of work that proves otherwise.

Watermark Calculation It is an assessment of water use and its associated impacts for a facility, process, or product, within stated boundaries, timeframes, and methodology. It may address water used directly on-site as well as water associated with procurement and the supply chain. Results vary between quantifying water volumes and assessing its impacts; therefore, a water bill alone is not considered a complete water footprint assessment.
Separating these indicators prevents overstating results or interpreting every volume entering the site as final consumption.
| Index | What does it describe? | What do we review? |
|---|---|---|
| Water withdrawal or supplied water | Water entering from specific sources into the facility boundaries. | Source, quantity, timeframe, meters, supply, and storage. |
| Water Consumption | The portion that does not return to the same water source within the approved temporal and spatial boundaries, such as evaporation or incorporation into the product. | Water pathways, return to the source, and the nature of the process, according to the methodology. |
| Water drainage | Water leaving the boundaries to a specified destination. | Quantities, destinations, quality, treatment, and ultimate fate. |
| Water footprint assessment | Assessment of water use and its potential impacts according to the chosen framework. | Boundaries, spatial and temporal context, quality, and assessment indicators. |
Water recycling on-site is not considered a new external supply source in every cycle. We distinguish internal flows from incoming water to avoid double counting.
The task can be performed at the facility level, a specific process, or a product; the proposal clearly defines the included boundaries, any exclusions, and their reasons.
Inventorying water for operations, washing, cooling, irrigation, and utilities, determining what exits in the product, discharge, or evaporation, and linking them to available sources and meters.
Studying water associated with raw materials, energy, utilities, and suppliers as they enter the scope, while documenting data sources, assumptions, and reliance limits.
Linking data to the place of use, its season, source, and discharge destination, and studying appropriate impact indicators when the assessment methodology requires it.
Demonstrating where water is used, which processes or locations represent the largest contribution, while distinguishing between high consumption and high water impact.
Reviewing unexplained differences in the water balance, and prioritizing field verification points or improving measurement, rather than considering every difference as a confirmed leak.
Studying opportunities for conservation, managing washing, cooling, irrigation, and reuse as appropriate for the required quality and operational conditions.
Fixing a period, data, and methodology that allow for later performance comparison, while explaining changes in production, seasonality, and facility boundaries.
Providing information on sources, quantities, assumptions, and indicators that can be used within the appropriate report for the scope of the assignment.
Comparing improvement opportunities according to technical feasibility, costs, estimated savings, and data that require confirmation.
The service begins by reviewing what is available, then gaps and any need for measurements, visits, or specialized entities within the scope of work are determined.
We review the study objective, included activities and sites, the period, comparison unit, and required outputs, and choose the appropriate methodology.
We collect meter, billing, supply, operation, drainage, and treatment data, then review units, periods, missing data, and unusual values.
We link sources to tanks, processes, products, discharge, and reuse, while separating internal flows from external inputs and outputs.
We prepare the water balance and usage indicators, and carry out the footprint and impact assessments included in the scope, while documenting data, estimates, and result limits.
We rank the proposed measures according to the problem, feasibility, and verification needs, and review water quality conditions before suggesting any change in its use.
We deliver the results, tables, maps, observations, and an improvement plan with priorities, responsibilities, and indicators, according to the agreed-upon outputs.
Not all data needs to be complete before contacting us. Send what is available, and we will determine a customized list for your activity and study period.
Water bills, well data or tanker supply when present, main and sub-meters, and used treated water sources.
Production quantities, operating hours, occupancy or cultivated area, and washing, cooling, irrigation, and water-using processes.
Drainage quantities and destinations, treatment and reuse station data, and available analysis results according to the assessment objective.
Network and tank diagrams, measurement points, distribution routes, inventory changes, maintenance work, and recorded malfunctions.
Material types, quantities, sources, and supplier data when the assessment includes indirect water or a product life cycle.
Previous reports, conservation plans, permits, relevant requirements, site boundaries, and the period required for assessment.
In case of data gaps, we clarify what can be measured and what can be estimated, the source and limitations of each estimate, and the measurement improvement plan. Estimates do not turn into actual readings in the report.
We link incoming water to outgoing water, inventory changes, and consumption pathways within consistent temporal and spatial boundaries. We review reading timing discrepancies, meter accuracy, and unmeasured flows before interpreting any differences.
The flow map may include water contained within the product or transported off-site, estimated evaporation or losses, discharge, and reuse. The report clarifies the estimation method for each pathway and the remaining uncertainty.
We define the reference according to the study question and the entity that will use the results. The scope of work clarifies the difference between a water efficiency review and a full water footprint assessment.
It links the water footprint assessment to the life cycle perspective and impact indicators. The level of application, data, and study boundaries are determined before work begins; collecting invoices or preparing a water balance is not sufficient to claim completion of a compliant assessment.
The Water Footprint Network methodology may present blue, green, and grey components when applicable: consumption of surface and groundwater, rainwater used, and a volumetric index associated with the pollutant load. The grey component is neither the actual discharge quantity nor domestic greywater.
Indicators vary across frameworks; the report clarifies the methodology used and its units, and does not confuse actual volume with impact indicator results or present either as a substitute for the other.
Outputs and delivery formats are specified in the work proposal, and the results reflect the agreed-upon boundaries, data, and methodology.
Objective, boundaries, period, methodology, data sources, assumptions, results, and limitations of use, according to the scope of the assessment.
Distribution of water use across sources, locations, and operations, with appropriate comparison indicators for the data and period.
Show water pathways from sources to use, discharge, and reuse, indicating unresolved gaps.
Distinguish actual readings from estimates, and document gaps, calculation sources, and recommendations for improving data collection.
Prioritized procedures, responsibilities, implementation phases, indicators, and preliminary estimates that need confirmation when necessary.
Key findings, improvement opportunities, proposed decisions, and actions requiring further technical study or measurement.
Add measurement points when needed, review meters and valves, and inspect areas showing unexplained discrepancies.
Review rinsing and operation cycles and equipment type, and evaluate alternatives while maintaining quality, safety, and process requirements.
Study water quality, required treatment, destination of use, and applicable requirements, avoiding the transfer of pollution to another process.
Review actual requirements, schedules, seasonality, and irrigation method when applicable, and link decisions to site data.
Studying the relationship between product waste and the water used to produce it, rather than focusing solely on direct utility bills.
Comparing withdrawal or consumption against an appropriate unit of production or activity, while accounting for variations in production, weather, and operating limits.
Expected savings are estimates based on data and assumptions. Results are measured after implementation, and a uniform reduction percentage is not guaranteed for all facilities.
The need arises when water usage increases, bills diverge from activity levels, preparing a sustainability report, planning an expansion, or responding to a client or investor request. The assessment is also useful when establishing a baseline and a conservation plan.
Beneficiaries of the service include industrial, food, agricultural, and construction facilities, hotels, hospitals, commercial complexes, and treatment plants, with the scope customized to the nature of each activity.
Cost and duration are determined after reviewing the number of sites and operations, the reporting period, data level, and the inclusion of supply chain or impact assessments. A study based on complete operational data differs from an assignment requiring measurements, analyses, or supplier data.
The proposal outlines the deliverables, visits, included reviews, and data collection responsibilities. Measurement, analysis, and independent verification work, if requested, are clearly specified within the proposal or in a separate scope.
No. The bill is a source of data for supplied water, while the assessment requires defining boundaries, pathways of use, discharge, and consumption, and may include the supply chain and impact indicators according to the objective of the study.
It can include water associated with materials, energy, and suppliers when they fall within the study boundaries. The report clarifies what is included, what is excluded, the reasons for exclusion, and the quality of available data.
Additional measurements or documented estimates can be reviewed depending on the study objective. Estimated data is distinguished from actual data, and the impact of the shortage and the limits of using the results are clarified, along with a plan to improve data collection.
Withdrawal describes water entering from specified sources, while consumption relates to the portion that does not return to the same water source within the approved boundaries, such as evaporation or incorporation into the product. Distinguishing between them requires tracking flows, time periods, and locations.
Reuse may help reduce the required fresh water, but water quality, energy, treatment, destination of use, and their impacts must be reviewed. No final conclusion should be assumed without evaluating boundaries and data.
No. The report is not an automatic certification. The scope of the standard's application and the requirements for review or verification, if any, are determined independently and clearly, and a water balance alone is not sufficient to claim compliance with a full assessment.
It uses consistent boundaries, periods, methodology, and indicators, and interprets changes in production, seasonality, locations, and data. A decrease in the total may reflect a decline in activity, so intensity indicators are reviewed alongside absolute quantities.
No. The review of flows and data helps identify points that require verification, and leaks may require specialized inspection. Savings depend on the implemented actions and operating conditions and are verified by measurement after implementation.
The duration varies depending on the number of sites, scope of assessment, data readiness, and the need for measurements, analyses, or supplier information. A proposed schedule is determined after reviewing the data and scope of work.
The appropriate methodology is selected based on the objective, data, and the report's beneficiary, and its scope of application is clarified in the business proposal and the report.
Principles, requirements and guidelines related to life cycle water footprint assessment.
Volumetric water accounting and assessment manual, and interpretation of components and their spatial and temporal boundaries.
Send your facility activity, project city, number of locations, evaluation period, and available bills and readings. We will review the data and determine the scope of the water footprint calculation, appropriate outputs, and steps to complete the information.
Results reflect the assessment boundaries, period, methodology, and the quality of available data. Studies, site visits, measurements, and any independent review are defined within the agreed scope of work, and water quality requirements and relevant conditions are reviewed before proposing reuse.